# Positioning Liqwid for Long-Term Growth and LQ Token Appreciation

**URL:** <https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/positioning-liqwid-for-long-term-growth-and-lq-token-appreciation/1938>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [November 27, 2025, 4:47pm UTC](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/positioning-liqwid-for-long-term-growth-and-lq-token-appreciation/1938 "2025-11-27T16:47:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlorianVolery](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f0a364/32.png) [@FlorianVolery](https://gov.liqwid.finance/u/FlorianVolery)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2025, 8:41am UTC](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/positioning-liqwid-for-long-term-growth-and-lq-token-appreciation/1938/12 "2025-11-28T08:41:57Z")

</div>

Dear @gil and @JakeMN

The current low LQ price is largely a consequence of decisions made two years ago, when LQ stakers rejected reducing LQ inflation—a concern I raised already in 2023 multiple times (see [here](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/transition-the-monthly-fixed-lq-user-distribution-rewards-to-a-dynamic-reward-system/1141)).

That choice created persistent selling pressure, which ultimately hindered our ability to raise capital and led to the use of debt to sustain protocol growth.

If you have a better proposal to repay the POL debt in a responsible and realistic way, please feel free to share your ideas?

This vote is not about revisiting past decisions—it is about ensuring the long-term financial health of the Liqwid protocol and restoring conditions for sustainable value growth.

Investors are ready to deploy capital, but the current level of LQ issuance must be addressed, as it remains the root cause of the problem.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/positioning-liqwid-for-long-term-growth-and-lq-token-appreciation/1938)._