I am not sure of your math. What I calculate based on a $1M exchange of each:
$1M USD equals 1,694,915.25 ADA at $.59 USD/ADA
1,694,915 ADA converted to MIN is 27,812,852. Liqwid DAO receives 27M MIN Tokens
1,694,915 ADA converted to LQ is 242,889. MIN DAO received 242,889 LQ Tokens
MIN Current Circulating Supply is 1,082,367,249
LQ Holders receive 2.5% share of current DAO ownership
LQ Current Circulating Supply is 4,571,920
MIN Holders receive 5.3% share of current DAO ownership
LQ holders will retain a large share of DAO voting power than MIN. Further, 1.5% share of voting of the DAO is hardly going to run away with governance as there is still 98.5% of circulating supply voting from community and team.
Also, from the proposal:
B. Minswap DAO agrees to delegate 50% of their LQ voting power to Cardano community members, SPOs or Liqwid DAO stewards of their DAOs choosing.
So this 1.5% is further reduced because most of it is delegated voting to other members. I believe the idea that MIN DAO will have “control” of Liqwid voting is a red herring.
**The data will fluctuate based on exchange prices of ADA, MIN, LQ. If the total $3M were exchanged the percentages would be higher by (7.7% MIN for LQ DAO and 16% LQ for MIN DAO). Liqwid gains more governance on a percentage term than MIN DAO for higher amounts of USD.
We need deeper liquidity, we have from day 1. I was disappointed when the first proposal to deepen liquidity failed as I believed we needed it then. I think this proposal is preferable to triple farming where the majority will farm to sell rewards.