# 3 Proposals to improve LQ becoming a better value token **URL:** \ **Category:** Temperature Check\ **Created:** [March 28, 2024, 3:43pm UTC](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/3-proposals-to-improve-lq-becoming-a-better-value-token/1551 "2024-03-28T15:43:32Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 15
**Author:** ![FlorianVolery](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f0a364/32.png) [@FlorianVolery](https://gov.liqwid.finance/u/FlorianVolery)\ **Post date:** [March 30, 2024, 11:38am UTC](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/3-proposals-to-improve-lq-becoming-a-better-value-token/1551/15 "2024-03-30T11:38:27Z")
1 year ago, I announced what would happen with mass LQ inflation. You are read the information there. People always tends to focus on the free lunch instead of understanding the big picture. [http://govnew.liqwid.finance/t/transition-the-monthly-fixed-lq-user-distribution-rewards-to-a-dynamic-reward-system/1141](http://govnew.liqwid.finance/t/transition-the-monthly-fixed-lq-user-distribution-rewards-to-a-dynamic-reward-system/1141) This current proposal is made in the interests of all LQ buyers and long-term holders who care about the success of the Liqwid protocol. Early holders have already been massively rewarded and will benefit from a 3-month return at 50% APY. Additionally, what you are alluding to in your argument is the fact that reducing LQ issuance will benefit all holders with a price increase, while LQ revenues are also expected to increase. Also, the early LQ stakers have also a big boost on the programmatic rewards (see proposal #3). Also, I cannot read anything reading your overall strategy of the LQ price, including POL, financing and many other topics. If you think you can come up with a better plan, you are welcome. We are here all keen to read your throughts? --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.liqwid.finance/t/3-proposals-to-improve-lq-becoming-a-better-value-token/1551)._